We need crime prevention, not the death penalty Essay -- essays resear

We Need Crime Prevention, Not the terminal penalisationFor most iniquitys affiliated in the linked States a fine, judgment of conviction of time in jail or execution is the penalisation. However, the decease penalization is the most questionable punishment. Is it morally right? Is it effective in deterring crime, primarily bump offs? stomach or not you agree if it is moral or not, one issue remains. The finis penalty is not an effective way to deter crime. The death penalty has existed as long as humans have existed. The quote "an snapper for an eye" is found in the Bible. In the middle ages fines, public humiliation and handcuffs were appropriate punishments for all crimes, and death penalty for all murders. Today, Federal law states that the death penalty is to be enforced with convicted criminals for treason deserting armed forces during wartime murder committed by a soldier kidnapping and murder that involves crossing state lines murder committed during an airplane hijacking and of course, homicide. The death penalty is also called for punishment of for attempting to kill anyone investigating or prosecuting his or her activities advising, directing, authorizing or assisting in the murder of someone. Also, The Anti-Drug misuse act of 1988 calls for the death penalty for all drug related killings. along with that, The bill amending sec. 848 to controlled substances act calls for the death penalty or life imprisonment for indisputable drug offences possession of 10 or more kg of heroin, cocaine, phencyclidine hydrochloride or analogue. Added to that, The drug kingpin act sates the use of death penalty for convicted major drug dealers caught with huge quantities of drugs, over 66 lbs. of heroin and 330 lbs. of cocaine. Even though there are these federal laws requiring the use of the death penalty for the crimes, State laws solely consider one crime, murder, to be a capital offense. In the United States alone there have been 4047 exec utions since 1930, and 188 were from 1977-1996. In 1996, there were a total of 15,168,100 arrests 33,050 for lively rape 1,506,200 involving drug violations and 19,020 for murder and non-negligent manslaughter. The death penalty was enforced 45 times. The death penalty is an expensive punishment, since 1976 the united states have spent 700 million dollars in it. Methods of the death pen... ...s no effect on the deteration of crimes. Statistics show that there is no relationship between the numeral of crimes committed in death penalty states and the number of crimes committed in non-death penalty states. While a majority of battalion turn overs the death penalty is a good punishment for crimes, they do not believe it helps get rid of and prevent crime. Other methods such as change magnitude police officers and a decrease on the availability of handguns are 2 of umpteen alternatives in prevention crimes. Enforcing a harsh punishment for committing a crime is not an effective wa y to prevent it from happening. Preventing crimes from happening is the most effective way to deter crime. Bibliography"Crimes, Politics and Race" Harvard Journal of law and Public form _or_ system of government Winter 1997 pg. 405 "Death Penalty Information Center", 1997 http//www.esential.org/dpic/dpic.html (8 Feb. 1998) Nardo, Don Death Penalty San Diego Lucent Books Inc, 1992 Wekesser, Carol The Death Penalty Opposing Viewpoints. San Diego Greenhaven Press, 1991 World almanac and Book of Facts 1998 Mahwah, NJ world Almanac and Book of Facts, 1997 We need crime prevention, not the death penalty Essay -- essays resear We Need Crime Prevention, Not the Death PenaltyFor most crimes committed in the United States a fine, sentence of time in jail or execution is the punishment. However, the death penalty is the most questionable punishment. Is it morally right? Is it effective in deterring crime, primarily murders? Weather or not you agree if it is m oral or not, one issue remains. The death penalty is not an effective way to deter crime. The death penalty has existed as long as humans have existed. The quote "an eye for an eye" is found in the Bible. In the middle ages fines, public humiliation and imprisonment were appropriate punishments for all crimes, and death penalty for all murders. Today, Federal law states that the death penalty is to be enforced with convicted criminals for treason deserting armed forces during wartime murder committed by a soldier kidnapping and murder that involves crossing state lines murder committed during an airplane hijacking and of course, homicide. The death penalty is also called for punishment of for attempting to kill anyone investigating or prosecuting his or her activities advising, directing, authorizing or assisting in the murder of someone. Also, The Anti-Drug abuse act of 1988 calls for the death penalty for all drug related killings. Along with that, The bill amending sec. 8 48 to controlled substances act calls for the death penalty or life imprisonment for certain drug offences possession of 10 or more kg of heroin, cocaine, phencyclidine or analogue. Added to that, The drug kingpin act sates the use of death penalty for convicted major drug dealers caught with huge quantities of drugs, over 66 lbs. of heroin and 330 lbs. of cocaine. Even though there are these federal laws requiring the use of the death penalty for the crimes, State laws only consider one crime, murder, to be a capital offense. In the United States alone there have been 4047 executions since 1930, and 188 were from 1977-1996. In 1996, there were a total of 15,168,100 arrests 33,050 for forcible rape 1,506,200 involving drug violations and 19,020 for murder and non-negligent manslaughter. The death penalty was enforced 45 times. The death penalty is an expensive punishment, since 1976 the united states have spent 700 million dollars in it. Methods of the death pen... ...s no effect o n the deteration of crimes. Statistics show that there is no relationship between the number of crimes committed in death penalty states and the number of crimes committed in non-death penalty states. While a majority of people believes the death penalty is a good punishment for crimes, they do not believe it helps get rid of and prevent crime. Other methods such as increased police officers and a decrease on the availability of handguns are 2 of many alternatives in prevention crimes. Enforcing a harsh punishment for committing a crime is not an effective way to prevent it from happening. Preventing crimes from happening is the most effective way to deter crime. Bibliography"Crimes, Politics and Race" Harvard Journal of law and Public Policy Winter 1997 pg. 405 "Death Penalty Information Center", 1997 http//www.esential.org/dpic/dpic.html (8 Feb. 1998) Nardo, Don Death Penalty San Diego Lucent Books Inc, 1992 Wekesser, Carol The Death Penalty Opposing Viewpoints. Sa n Diego Greenhaven Press, 1991 World Almanac and Book of Facts 1998 Mahwah, NJ world Almanac and Book of Facts, 1997